CONTEXTUAL STUDIES COURSEWORK: PART ONE VISUAL CULTURE IN PRACTICE

Reading point

Read Douglas Crimp’s essay ‘The Photographic Activity of Postmodernism’ on the oca student website. This essay was first published in October 15 (Winter 1980) and is also available in Crimp, D.

As with all the readings you’ll be asked to do for this course, make notes on what you’ve read – and its relevance to your practice (if any) – in your research folder. (Boothroyd, 2020:28)

The Photographic Activity of Postmodernism.

Douglas Crimp first presented 1980, He is an art critic and a professor of art history.

Crimp calls Postmodernism a breach of modernism, from the museum, art history and photography.

Photography. In his 1978 work “Pictures”, he used the term post modernism referring to exhibited art of some younger artists in New York. He explored their concern about the seventy’s performative art, moving towards art with a “presence”.

He goes on to describe the difference between a presence as being there, to a subject having a presence. Concluding that work can have a presence even as a reproduction at a distance from an original. Whilst Benjamin only conceded aura to a minority of art works, Crimp points out that photography has since had aura conferred to it. He suggests that photography can be authenticated by classifications such as rarity of age, and the vintage print, but more importantly the “subjectivization of photography” (Crimp, 1995:97), an appreciation of artist’s stlye, which collecting and exhibiting artwork enhances.

Within this essay he discusses statements of Sherrie Levine on representation. On AfterSherrieLevine.com (AfterSherrieLevine.com, 2021) she rephotographed Walker Evans’ photographs from the exhibition catalogue “First and Last”, which can be downloaded to print out with a certificate of authenticity for each image, thus making them accessible by anyone. Levine suggests that representation creates desire to see the original subject, which can never be fulfilled as it is the art, not the subject that is the original, and therefore photography is the artwork.

Crimp also gives as an example the work of Cindy Sherman where she creates, narrates, and acts in her images. In doing so Crimp says that she has reversed the terms art and autobiography. He also comments on the work of Richard Prince who uses commercial images and presents them as documentary. Crimp suggests that these images “acquired an aura, only now it is not a function of presence but of absence, severed from origin, from an originator, from authenticity” concluding that aura has translated into a presence or a ghost (Crimp,1995:100).

Crimp shows that mechanical reproduction reducing the importance of the original, was a sign that modernism, which valued originality and artistic expression was being supplanted by post modernism. He appreciated new approaches to photography in this emerging postmodern era which embraced more contemporary theories in photography, and the role that photography played in challenging the museums and galleries. At this point I’m not sure whether postmodernism will be relevant to my practice.

References:

AfterSherrieLevine.com (2021) At: https://aftersherrielevine.com/ (Accessed 11/10/2021).

Boothroyd, S (2020) Photography 3: Body of work coursebook. Open College of the Arts. Barnsley.

Crimp, D and Lawler, L. (1995) ‘The Photographic Activity of Postmodernism’ In: On the museum’s ruins. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press

Next post: https://nkssite6.photo.blog/category/contextual-studies/coursework/part-one-visual-culture-in-practice/barthes-rhetoric-of-the-image/

CONTEXTUAL STUDIES COURSEWORK: PART ONE VISUAL CULTURE IN PRACTICE

WALTER BENJAMIN “THE WORK OF ART IN THE AGE OF MECHANICAL REPRODUCTION”

Read Walter Benjamin’s essay ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’ in Evans & Hall (1999) Visual Culture: The Reader. What do you think about Benjamin’s viewpoint? And Kracauer’s? Make some notes on your learning log. (Boothroyd, 2020:25).

Benjamin’s 1936 views on art, aura authenticity are put forward in his essay “The work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” (1999):

  • Though art has always been replicated photography could do this at speed.
  • Reproductions of art will always be lacking in the elements of time and space, its unique existence, and the original is proof of authenticity.
  • Photography as a process of reproduction is able to enhance aspects possibly unseen by the naked eye, as well as place the object into a place where it couldn’t be otherwise.
  • However, when art is mechanically reproduced and loses its physical existence in time, and the physical existence ends, then its transmissibility is gone; Benjamin calls this the loss of “aura”.
  • He says that destroying aura by reproduction and transferring its location extracts its uniqueness; Uniqueness is bedded in the fabric of tradition and uniqueness is not transmissible, and distance however close, destroys this.

Benjamin did however believe that reproductions which produced and circulated copies of images enabled more people to view images, increasing communication, viewing and interpretation, and therefore democracy in photography.

I have found it hard to access much about the German critic Siegfried Kracauer and have resorted to Wikipedia for some clarity. He was critical of mechanical reproduction, he thought that memory was under threat and was being challenged by modern technology, particularly photography as it replicates some of the tasks done by memory. His view was that photography fixes one moment in time, where memory draws from various instances; he suggested that photography removes and emotion, essence and meaning from an object, and stressed the ontological relation of the photograph to reality.

Benjamin brought to attention some of modifications he noticed mechanical reproduction brought about the destroying of the aura, but also highlighted the liberation it can bring. Whilst Benjamin connects aura with the presence of the original, and reproduction depreciates this he concluded that some photographed work does retain an aura. Kracauer however was less positive about the effect of technological change on art. Other critics in the 1970s such as Rosalind Krauss and Douglas Crimp focused on the demise of the original piece of art as a sign that the modernist movement was dying.

I believe that as long as reproductions are noted as such, and manipulations of artworks are also noted as such, then there are many positives about being able to share works of art in a wider sense.  Being able to share art in an aesthetic of informative manner widely may be more important that authenticity.

References:

Benjamin, W (1969) “The work of art in the age of Mechanical Reproduction” In: Evans, H. (1999) Visual Culture: The Reader. (ed.): SAGE Publications. Pp 72-79 (Accessed 1.10.21)

Boothroyd, S (2020) Photography 3: Body of work coursebook. Open College of the Arts. Barnsley.

Marien, M. W. (2014) Photography: A Cultural History. (s.l.): Laurence King Publishing.

Wikipedia contributors (2021) Siegfried Kracauer. At: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siegfried_Kracauer&oldid=1045423839 (Accessed 1.10.21)

Next post: https://nkssite6.photo.blog/category/contextual-studies/coursework/part-one-visual-culture-in-practice/crimp-postmodernism/

CONTEXTUAL STUDIES: INTRODUCTORY UNIT

Exercise 1:  What are your expectations of level 3 study? 

We are asked to write a short paragraph or around 5 bullet points identifying what we want from the course unit. This is my response for the area of Contextual studies:

  • Improve my critiquing skills.
  • Increase my understanding how to and build contextual and theoretical framework for my photographic work.
  • Hone my analytical skills, and how to effectively articulate them.
  • Develop my knowledge of visual artists and their images, as well as how to research for material.
  • Refresh my academic writing skills.

We were also asked to write a short paragraph or 5 bulletin points highlighting what we’re bringing to the course unit:, this is my response for Contextual Studies:

  • Reflective skills.
  • Love of learning.
  • Inventiveness.
  • Growing confidence. 
  • Organisational skills.